Thursday 28 January 2010

ANOTHER AUSSIE IMMIGRANT WITH FAILED BASKIN ROBBINS SHOP - NO SUPPORT FROM ALLIED BRANDS ONCE THE "SALE IS MADE"! SHOP WORTH NOTHING NOW!

TRUE STORY FROM EX-BASKIN ROBBINS FRANCHISEE - PERTH
----------------------

How could things that are meant to be so good; could ever go so wrong?

Baskin 31 Robbins name is so synonymous with worldwide brand, famous, superior quality, happiness, fun, magical, adventurous or whatever you feel like associating it, every time you unite your taste buds with one of those extensive burst, heavenly exploding rich flavour of ice cream. We have to admit, the quality of ice cream it produces and the “31derful” selection is number one. We’ve seen too so many success stories and glamour which BR is capable of fabricating, especially in Japan and Korea. From customers’ perspective, all things seem cosy and enjoyable except for those coins or notes you have to hand in for the exchange of the short term delightful moments.

Being on the opposite side of the cashier counter is something totally different. Most of the time, doing business and enjoying ice cream don’t mix. As one of the ex-franchisees of Australian Baskin Robbins, I would not brag nor do I have the option of reaping profits from the shop I used to run. Profitable (read: healthy consistent profit margin) Baskin Robbins shops are obsolete in Australia. This phenomenon proves difficult for loyal BR followers to digest. How could things that are meant to be so good; could ever go so wrong? To try to explain whose fault is it will be prejudicial, yet the problems may remain, regardless of ‘he thinks she thinks’ syndrome or finger pointing cycle. We are talking about franchise’s reputation; particularly Baskin Robbins is hanging on the balance.

If I may discuss for the purpose of this article, there are several factors which contribute to the success/failure of a franchise business, in this case, strictly only for Australian Baskin Robbins and their corrupt parent, Allied Brands. (ABQ)

Let’s break down the factors that contribute to the failures:

1. Inexperienced Newcomers
The demographics for newcomers are usually but not limited to these traits: young, ambitious, new players in the market/industry, inattentive to details, and may have access to quite large sum of fund. Since they are inexperienced, their arsenals of weapons are theories from educational institutions, limited information from the franchisor, and some advices from the lawyers and accountants. Theories are good for trial and error in our case study or assignment in college or university, but in real life practices it is not mathematically correct; it is not always A + B = C. Just because you spent a quarter million buying the so called global brand doesn’t make you an instant millionaire. The cost of owning a brand new Baskin Robbins would equal to from $250,000 to $500,000. Yet most of the second hand store that are on sale usually much less - recently a BR shop here sold for less than $40K after the first owner paid over $300K! The number sometimes speaks for itself. It tells you how the business sort of going.

2. Indifferent Franchisor
It is harsh enough for franchisees to feel the sting of paying initial set up cost with 6 digits figure coming from the bank, on a loan or their lifetime savings. On top of that, 10% of hard earned, blood and sweat breaking turnover money goes straight to the franchisor pocket. The least a franchisee could or ought to anticipate from its franchisor if a genuine help is not an option, then a well spent advertising fund is minimum. Over the years, Allied Brands’ mismanagement, wrongful spending, and wastage are well documented and quite blatant. This is not something that new franchisees are expecting. Even though the overall business of all the franchisees is not performing well, the franchisor decided to go public in 2004 nevertheless. The cry for help from most of the franchisees are heard as whinging, immature, trouble maker, superficial, and what not. So much stories from past franchisees for investing the time and money which they never ever seen them back. From the beginning, they hardly want to do what’s best for the franchisees, instead, take a short cut in any way they could. The management never look in franchisees best interest when negotiating the rent with the landlord, choosing the site, doing research on customer’s response and feedback first as a potential new business in a new sites, new suburbs and new surroundings. Training is done in a manner of rushing (only one 3 days, in the USA the training is THREE WEEKS?), more on theories of the “Legend of Baskin Robbins” and how to pay royalty and ad fund correctly, and less on how to become successful franchisees and managing the shop and variety of challenges. It has been suppressed communication between franchisees for sharing of knowledge for fear of everyone finding the truth about Allied Brands mismanagement and ineffective & inefficient ways of proliferating Baskin Robbins franchise in Australia.

Our Franchise Business Manager changes often, I have several different ones every year. None have any idea how to run shop, their job is like collection agency asking where my payment to Baskin Robbins are coming and why I don't make them faster. They don't even know how to make a scoop of ice cream. Of course they don't stay as Franchise Business "Manager" very long because they see all failing Baskin Robbins shops all day and get many angry people in their face. It is a shameful job.

When you ask for operations assistance from Allied Brands, the blame is always on us - We have to check for our own mistakes, it is our faults that the business is not doing well, the scooping is too big, too many staff, not spending enough money for in-store marketing, spread more freebies to bring more customers, print more free stuff promotions, give away birthday or charities free ice creams, ridiculous more “buy one get one” discounts, calendars full of free and free and free and free and all the free ice creams in the world. If the product is so good, why are franchisees always told the best marketing is to give it away free?

3. Ruthless Fixed & Variable Expenses
Whether we made $1 or $1 million, there are some fixed expenses that need to be paid such as rent, electricity, royalty & ad fund, accountancy, staff wages & superannuation, cost of goods, insurance, etc. You still have to leave a budget for unforeseen stuff such as repair for the freezer, hot water system, in-store marketing, new uniforms, etc. The list can go on, in fact, when your business is not doing well, the expenses feel more burdening to bear. Western Power, Water Corporation, Westfield Group, Allied Brands, City Council, Federal Government, your accountant & lawyer, your staff, your relevant bank, all of them don’t feel sorry whether you make $1 for the whole year as long as you pay their fees. Once you put a clause that you have to be profitable enough as a condition of payment then they would go crazy. Allied Brands select my site and they say they have "big experience" at picking terrific locations. My site was at dead end in bad shopping mall, with rent 30% higher than Wendys shop with great location. Allied Brands in business to sell shops, not as partner with franchisees. They frankly don't give a shit about anyone.

4. No other Assistance
When you’re doing business, basically you are on your own. No such thing as a lifeline; ala Business 101. There is a Retailers Association as a country wide and also a state wide for retailers’ representation for legal and resolution matters also a government body called ACCC though just in case we stumble, but both bodies don't have any power. Cases like misleading, unconscionable conduct on the Trade Practices Act are impossible for small business owner and very money consuming because of the legal infrastructure to file a court session, hire solicitors, and pay red tapes. Justice is not free and could be very expensive in Australia. Unless it is plain and clear written in the contract then it is buyers beware.

My shop is gone. I have lost over $500k and several years of hard work trying to make a success with this brand. Maybe I did something wrong, but Allied Brands and Baskin Robbins can't ever explain what it is. They're now preparing to sell my shop again to some other poor migrant sucker.

How can this be allowed in modern country like Australia?

Tuesday 19 January 2010

DETAILS OF VC MONEY IN ALLIED BRANDS SHOW HIGH COST TO SHARE HOLDERS, MORE SHARE DILUTION, AND LIKELY BANK REJECTIONS

Allied Brands Ltd (ABQ) has made what they claim is a huge announcement about Venture Capital investment into ABQ. Details of the cash injection continue to reveal what share brokers have already been advising clients about ABQ - to run far away.

Venture Capital money is last resort, high priced money that ABQ has tapped when banks and other normal sources of operating capital have rejected more money for a company. DETAILS HERE of the Springtree investment show ABQ paying huge upfront fees of over $160,000, high interest on cash drawdowns, and perhaps other details not revealed by the company in their market statement. This isn't acquisition money - its operating funds!

Is Springtree going to install their own director on the board to watch where their money is going? How can $100k/month in cash be anything but more money to squander? Why is Allied Brands biggest competitor, Retail Food Group (RFG) comfortably making acquisitions with the huge cash flow normally generated by franchise service companies?

ABQ continues to show that they are clever at keeping outside cash flowing in, while franchisees continue to see profits decline and shops continue to close. Clearly the ASX market isn't fooled by all this trickery - as ABQ shares continue to decline. ABQ has seen over 50% share dilution in the last year, with profit forecasts continually missed by massive amounts, and squandered opportunities continue all while cash injections have been spent on management share loans and other insider perks.


Friday 15 January 2010

ALLIED BRANDS CAN'T FIND ANY MORE AUSTRALIAN SUCKERS, FINDS MORE DOUGH TO WASTE FROM US VENTURE CAPITAL

Allied Brands Ltd. (ABQ) management have been stunned to find out that securing more money to squander WON'T get their share price to go up!

After announcing that some suckers in America have dumped high-cost venture capital money into Allied Brands with THIS ANNOUNCMENT, the share price actually declined to .15 yesterday, with downward pressure again built into Monday's open.

More details are being sourced from insiders and will be available shortly.

Sunday 10 January 2010

ALLIED BRANDS LOOKS TO AVOID PAYING PROMISED DIVIDEND TO SHAREHOLDERS IN EXCHANGE FOR MORE COMPANY DILUTION AND CASH FOR DIRECTORS

Allied Brands Ltd. (ABQ) has sent a hugely expensive mail out to current shareholders, offering them more shares in this failed investment rather than paying out their promised .05 dividend. This was a dividend for the last financial year, which they promised to pay out of THIS YEAR'S income because they had no cash to pay it properly.

The summary of this ill-fated idea is filed HERE.

The company has issued almost 60 MILLION new shares since this dividend was first promised at the beginning of the year. So the amount the company is committed to pay has increased by 30% - the cash raised by these new shares is long gone on company cars, bonuses, and increased management salaries.

This is clearly an indication that the company cannot afford the huge cash hit the promised dividend payment will extract from the dwindling cash available to the company. Insiders report that franchisee support jobs currently empty are not likely to be filled anytime soon due to the cash shortage.

And now this evidence that ABQ doesn't even want to pay their promised dividend!

And in the Allied Brands "after Xmas" sale, they've even promised a 10% discount on these reinvested dividends! In other words, this company is so desperate for cash they're willing to pay more than double the Reserve Bank cash rate.

For a company that first issued shares in 2004 at .45 cents, which are now at less than .17 and falling, what investor thinks handing these failed managers MORE MONEY would do them any good? You don't give a failed company MORE MONEY, you take it out. Averaging down is a sucker's play, as is the continued dilution of shares in this company just to raise more cash. With the 10% discount, the ex-dividend share price of Allied Brands should again dip below .12. And even at this price, it's too much!

You might do better flushing your cash down the nearest dunny!

Tuesday 5 January 2010

BASKIN ROBBINS SACKINGS RESULT IN WEBSITE GOING DARK?

As previously reported, Allied Brands Ltd. (ABQ) and senior managers at Baskin Robbins Australia sacked several middle managers late on New Year's Eve for unexplained reasons.

Since the lightning-like sackings, the Baskin Robbins Australia website has mysteriously gone walkabout. The site is filled only with a webserver placeholder, and the actual web address is no longer pointing at the right location.

Frantic calls were being made by senior Allied Brands management today in an attempt to locate the ex-marketing manager Sheridan Burke.

Seems Sheridan Burke is the password holder and listed contact for the domain name.







Sunday 3 January 2010

MORE STAFF SACKINGS AT BASKIN ROBBINS A SOUR NEW YEAR'S EVE PRESENT TO FRANCHISEES

Allied Brands (ABQ) management handed out the greatest of New Year's presents to two Baskin Robbins staff on New Year's Eve - they were sacked!

The first was ANOTHER franchisee support manager,
Tony Easthaughffe, who has joined the revolving door of hired-and-sacked low level managers. He's been at Allied Brands barely six months according to reports, and has been widely ridiculed by franchisees. This comes on top of previous reports of other support managers leaving due to their job duty that requires them to lie to franchisees at direction of senior management. The only franchisee support manager of any tenure is Trent Graham, originally a director of ABQ and son of the disgraced Graham family, continuing family tradition. Another perk of senior management, it's been said.

The second casualty is
Sheridan Burke, the marketing manager of a one-person department that has a stunning string of failures including a TV campaign that featured embarrassingly bad Batman and Robin characters - a campaign that never actually shows the product, the kiss of death for a food company. The marketing position also has been a revolving door of comings and goings - while Burke lasted 18 months, her successor who was said to be grossly incompetent was at Baskin Robbins Australia a longer time only due to a rurmoured illicit relationship with other married management. Typically, the woman in an office relationship was sacrificed as she was, and the manager continued to collect his share bonuses and office perks. Burke replaced this sacked marketing manager, who replaced a previously sacked marketing manager, who replaced a previously sacked manager. . . the pattern of marketing failures is all too clear.

And after the so-called "big announcement" that Allied Brands is going to participate at the 2010 World Expo in Shanghai, they go into this event with NO COMPETENT MARKETING.

Franchisees also report the required audit of the advertising fund is being investigated by the ACCC for compliance with the code.

All of this comes on the last day of the year in order to end-run the new workplace laws introduced by the Rudd government. One of our reports however indicates that at least one of these sacked employees will be filing unfair dismissal actions in any case.

Franchisees are stunned coming off their worst year in history that Allied Brands continues to fail at their most basic business task, attracting and retention of support staff that directly affect shop operation and marketing!